England | Waste packaging company director pays high price in data fraud

May 29, 2025

Environment Agency | A Birmingham-based director and his company have been ordered to pay a Proceeds of Crime confiscation order, fines and costs totalling £476,995 for breaches of the Fraud Act 2006.

This follows an Environment Agency investigation into fraudulent entry of waste packaging data.

At Birmingham Crown Court, Shaobo Qin, a director of EDU Case Ltd, pleaded guilty to fraud by false representation. He was given a two-year prison sentence suspended for 18 months.

Qin, age 42, of Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands, was also ordered to pay a Proceeds of Crime confiscation order of £255,057. He must pay within two months or face three years in prison.

He was also disqualified as a director for four years and ordered to do 200 hours of unpaid work.

His company, EDU Case Ltd of Portway Road, Rowley Regis, was fined £200,000. The Environment Agency were also awarded £21,995 in investigation costs.

The court was told Qin’s company was a plastics and recycling exports enterprise. The offences were discovered by the Environment Agency towards the end of 2022.

The company, orchestrated by Qin, was deliberately and systematically entering false data on to the Environment Agency’s National Packaging Waste Database (NPWD) for non-existent waste exports.

This resulted in Qin receiving a benefit for himself and his company in the sum of approx. £255,000. He was arrested on 10 January 2024, where he was interviewed by Environment Agency officers.

EDU Case were accredited to carry out plastic packaging exports and able to issue “evidence” of that activity in the form of tonnage figures on the database.

This evidence could be bought by businesses who are obliged to account for their plastic packaging waste under the Producer Responsibility Obligations (Packaging Waste) Regulations 2007.

An audit conducted by Environment Agency officers in 2023 and information following that work identified discrepancies between the amount of waste exported and the amount of evidence issued.

The false entries represented nearly two-thirds of the business’ entire trade in 2022 towards the end of that year.

As part of that audit, a legal notice was served on Qin and the company in September 2023.

This notice required the production of their evidence of plastic waste exports. In response, Qin sent a computer memory stick containing his business’ waste export evidence and a letter explaining a large discrepancy, described as an “overclaim.”

The letter stated that the company had carried out 1,239 metric tonnes of plastic waste exports in 2022, only 453.60 metric was genuine and that the majority of his trading, 785.40 metric tonnes was “a mistake.”

In sentencing, the judge said this was without doubt deliberate offending and pre-planned. There had been a significant undermining of the regulatory regime.

He accepted that there had been a guilty plea entered at first opportunity and that money had been put aside to repay the financial benefit made. The company was also fined to mark the seriousness of the offending.

— Accurate at time of publication | May 2025

Sign-up to the Barbour Monthly Newsletter

Get the latest Health, Safety and Environmental news and information – sign up for updates from Barbour EHS. Computer monitor What you’ll get:
  • Free downloads including Directors’ Briefings, legislation updates, webinars, risk assessments and more
  • VIP invites to events
  • Important industry news and updates
  • Invitations to hot topic webinars hosted by Barbour
  • Industry partner information
[ssba-buttons]

You May Also Be Interested In

Comments are closed.

✉ Sign up to the Barbour Newsletter

Free downloads, advance notice of webinars, product updates and perks – all straight to your inbox.

  • Barbour EHS may from time to time send updates about Barbour products and services. By providing your contact information you consent to being contacted for direct marketing purposes by Barbour EHS. Please ensure you review our Privacy Policy.