Scotland | Cambuslang waste carrier given £1,000 penalty for falsifying authorisation

May 16, 2025

SEPA | Scotland’s environmental regulator is reminding waste carriers of the serious consequences for forging records after serving a £1,000 civil penalty to a man who provided a waste transfer notice with false information.

 

Calum Morton of Cambuslang was served the Fixed Monetary Penalty (FMP) by the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) after the regulator found they had falsely claimed to be a registered waste carrier and provided false information about a waste deposit.

Waste transfer notices ensure that there is a clear audit trail from when waste is produced until disposal, providing an accurate record that enables regulators to track waste movements and check waste has been handled legally.

A waste transfer notice should provide essential information on the type and quantity of waste, where it originated from, and where it will be disposed of or treated. Any person who produces, keeps, or manages controlled waste or has control of it as a broker or dealer, or carriers must complete accurate waste transfer notes and make them available on request.

In May 2023, South Lanarkshire Council provided SEPA with a waste transfer notice identifying Mr. Morton as a registered waste carrier and detailing the collection and transport of waste from The Tudor Inn, Cambuslang, to the NWH Group waste management facility, Glasgow.

Witness statements collected from the Council and NWH Group certified that Mr. Morton had not deposited nor paid for the deposit of waste at the location, while checks of SEPA’s own records indicated that Mr. Morton was not registered as a waste carrier on the date stated on the waste transfer notice.

Under the Environmental Protection Act 1990, it is an offence for any person to make a statement which he knows to be false or misleading with respect to licences and an FMP was deemed appropriate enforcement action in this case.

SEPA can issue FMPs for relevant offences. FMPs are normally appropriate where an offence has not caused environmental harm or has caused minimal environmental harm with no lasting environmental effects or impacts on communities, for administrative offences and where little (if any) financial benefit arises from the offence.

— Accurate at time of publication | April 2025

Sign-up to the Barbour Monthly Newsletter

Get the latest Health, Safety and Environmental news and information – sign up for updates from Barbour EHS. Computer monitor What you’ll get:
  • Free downloads including Directors’ Briefings, legislation updates, webinars, risk assessments and more
  • VIP invites to events
  • Important industry news and updates
  • Invitations to hot topic webinars hosted by Barbour
  • Industry partner information
[ssba-buttons]

You May Also Be Interested In

Comments are closed.

✉ Sign up to the Barbour Newsletter

Free downloads, advance notice of webinars, product updates and perks – all straight to your inbox.

  • Barbour EHS may from time to time send updates about Barbour products and services. By providing your contact information you consent to being contacted for direct marketing purposes by Barbour EHS. Please ensure you review our Privacy Policy.