Spain | Spanish cabinet to spend €39 million on mental health to help suffering workforce

The Local | The Spanish Government has approved new funding for mental healthcare as new data shows that mental health sick leave among the country’s workforce has spiralled by 175% since the COVID-19 pandemic, costing taxpayers €15 billion a year.

The Spanish cabinet announced that it would spend €39 million in order to strengthen mental healthcare treatment availability in public hospitals.

It also approved another €17.83 million for the implementation of suicide prevention measures, in line with Spain’s Mental Health Action Plan 2025-2027 and the Suicide Prevention Plan 2025-2027.

According to the latest data from the 2023 National Health System Annual Report, 34% of the Spanish population has some form of mental health issue.

According to the Ministry of Health, the most common mental health problem is anxiety which affects 6.7% of the population with public health cover.

Depression is seen in 4.1% of the population and increases with age, while sleep disorders affect 5.4% of the population and also increases with age.

Psychoses overall affects 1.2%, while dementia is recorded in 3.2% of the population aged 60 and over.

The number of workers on sick leave has continued to rise since the pandemic and particularly mental health leave has risen by 175%.

The cost for the health authorities has continued to skyrocket. Public spending as a result of these absences amounts to around €15 billion per year and has increased by almost 80% since the pandemic, while the direct impact on businesses has grown by 62%, to €4.6 billion.

Particularly worrying is the incidence among young people, which has doubled in recent years.

Spaniards are also the world’s biggest consumers of anti-anxiety medication and the EU’s largest consumers of psychiatric or psychotropic medication, which includes antidepressants, anti-anxiety medications, stimulants, antipsychotics, and mood stabilisers.

According to the latest report from the Bank of Spain, 4.4% of workers are currently on sick leave and in 2019 it was only 2.7%. In total, more than 1.5 million people are on temporary disability. This is equivalent to half of the public administration.

— Accurate at time of publication | June 2025

Sign-up to the Barbour Monthly Newsletter

Get the latest Health, Safety and Environmental news and information – sign up for updates from Barbour EHS. Computer monitor What you’ll get:
  • Free downloads including Directors’ Briefings, legislation updates, webinars, risk assessments and more
  • VIP invites to events
  • Important industry news and updates
  • Invitations to hot topic webinars hosted by Barbour
  • Industry partner information

India | Commissioner orders fire safety compliance in hospitals

Times of India | Hospitals in Lucknow will have to conduct regular fire safety drills in compliance with the fire and electrical safety norms.

These directives were issued by divisional commissioner Roshan Jacob during a review meeting held for health infrastructure and care.

Jacob said that hospitals must be equipped with fire safety systems, valid safety certificates, and alternative emergency exits. She mandated fire safety training for all hospital staff and ordered regular mock drills with routine electrical safety checks.

The mandatory presence of doctors, full-time night OPDs, maternity services, and effective operation of Jan Aushadhi Kendras have been emphasised. Regular inspections of these centres are to be conducted by the Food Safety and Drug Administration (FSDA).

A drive has been launched to issue identity cards to senior citizens above 70 years of age, noting that only 37,113 out of 1,42,967 eligible persons received them so far. The monthly distribution of iron syrup to pregnant women, lactating mothers, adolescent girls and children has been emphasised under the Anaemia Mukt Bharat initiative.

Further directives include ensuring adequate hospital staffing, full operation of health ATMs, routine monitoring of diagnostic services, and the organisation of screening camps and vaccination drives in every village.

— Accurate at time of publication | June 2025

Sign-up to the Barbour Monthly Newsletter

Get the latest Health, Safety and Environmental news and information – sign up for updates from Barbour EHS. Computer monitor What you’ll get:
  • Free downloads including Directors’ Briefings, legislation updates, webinars, risk assessments and more
  • VIP invites to events
  • Important industry news and updates
  • Invitations to hot topic webinars hosted by Barbour
  • Industry partner information

Northern Ireland | Farmer convicted at Dungannon Magistrates’ Court

DAERA | Harry Brown (62), Lurganeden Road, Pomeroy, Co Tyrone has been convicted for an offence under Article 7(1)(a) of the Water (Northern Ireland) Order 1999 as amended. He pleaded guilty and was fined £1,500 plus £15 Offenders Levy.

Harry Brown (62), Lurganeden Road, Pomeroy, Co Tyrone has been convicted for an offence under Article 7(1)(a) of the Water (Northern Ireland) Order 1999 as amended. He pleaded guilty and was fined £1,500 plus £15 Offenders Levy.

The Court heard that NIEA Water Quality Inspectors responded to a water pollution incident that had occurred sometime between 12 and 13 June 2024. The NIEA Inspectors discovered that dark grey coloured agricultural effluent was flowing along a ditch, alongside the Pomeroy Road, before discharging to the Claggan River (a tributary of the Ballinderry River which flows into Lough Neagh).

The Inspectors traced the flow of effluent to farm premises at Lurganeden Road. On the farm, Mr Brown explained that he had been cleaning out one of the poultry houses. A nearby wooded area was inspected and dark grey coloured agricultural effluent was observed to be actively flowing through that area, and then entering land drainage pipes, before discharge to the waterway.

As part of the investigation, a statutory sample of the discharge was collected and analysed. The sample results indicated that the sample contained poisonous, noxious or polluting matter which would have been potentially harmful to aquatic life in a receiving waterway.

It is an offence under the Water (Northern Ireland) Order 1999 (as amended by the Water and Sewerage Services (Northern Ireland) Order 2006) under Article 7(1)(a) to make a polluting discharge to a waterway, under Article 7(2) to make a discharge of trade or sewage effluent into a waterway and under Article 7(6) for contravening the conditions of a consent issued under Article 7A3(a). This list is not exhaustive.

— Accurate at time of publication | June 2025

Sign-up to the Barbour Monthly Newsletter

Get the latest Health, Safety and Environmental news and information – sign up for updates from Barbour EHS. Computer monitor What you’ll get:
  • Free downloads including Directors’ Briefings, legislation updates, webinars, risk assessments and more
  • VIP invites to events
  • Important industry news and updates
  • Invitations to hot topic webinars hosted by Barbour
  • Industry partner information

England | Hospital and medic convicted over patient death

BBC News | A hospital trust and a staff member have been found guilty of health and safety failings over the death of a young woman in a mental health unit.

Alice Figueiredo, 22, was being treated at Goodmayes Hospital, east London, when she took her own life in July 2015, having previously made many similar attempts.

Following a seven-month trial at the Old Bailey, a jury found that not enough was done by the North East London Foundation NHS Trust (NELFT) or ward manager Benjamin Aninakwa to prevent Alice from killing herself.

The trust was cleared of the more serious charge of corporate manslaughter, while Aninakwa, 53, of Grays in Essex, was cleared of gross negligence manslaughter.

The jury deliberated for 24 days to reach all the verdicts, setting a joint record in the history of British justice, according to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS). Both the trust and Aninakwa were convicted under the Health and Safety at Work etc Act.

It was only the second time an NHS trust has faced a corporate manslaughter charge.

Speaking directly to Alice’s mother and stepfather after the verdict, Judge Richard Marks KC said it was clear from the evidence that she was an extremely special young woman and “their immense love for her had been very apparent”.

He also said he hoped they felt the case had been dealt with fully and that would “provide some consolation”.


Alice was admitted to a mental health ward at Goodmayes Hospital in Ilford in February 2015. She was under close observation on the Hepworth Ward, then managed by Aninakwa.

In the five months leading up to her death, she attempted suicide using plastic or bin bags on 18 occasions, mostly taking bin bags from the same shared toilet, the Old Bailey heard. The hospital had previously acknowledged the risk to patients of keeping bin bags on the ward and they were subsequently taken out of patient bedrooms.

However, despite warnings from Alice’s family, they were not removed from the communal toilet, which was left unlocked. On 7 July 2015, at her 19th attempt, she took her own life using a bin bag taken from the toilet.

During the trial, prosecutors said that not only was Alice repeatedly able to self-harm while she was in hospital, but that these incidents were not properly recorded or assessed. The court also heard there were concerns about Aninakwa’s communication, efficiency, clinical and leadership skills.

The trust had previously placed him on a performance improvement plan for three years, which ended in December 2014. In addition, there was a high turnover of agency staff on the ward, the court heard.


Alice’s mother Jane Figueiredo described the “intense pain” of being told about her death, saying it was the moment when “your entire life changes forever”. Her family prefer to remember the clever, creative, musical and funny young woman, who they say was full of life.

“She had the most amazing quick wit and sense of humour,” Mrs Figueiredo said.

“She used to be able to make me laugh more than anybody in the world. And I really miss that.”

Alice had experienced periods of deep depression since she was a teenager and also developed an eating disorder. She was admitted to hospital on several occasions and her condition had always improved after treatment, her family said.

Her stepfather Max Figueiredo said it was a question of managing her illness and “trusting the medical profession to make the right decisions”.

Mrs Figueiredo says she raised concerns about her daughter’s care verbally and in writing on a number of occasions to the hospital and to Mr Aninakwa. After Alice died, she said the family found it very difficult to get answers about what happened. For nearly a decade they gathered evidence and pressed both the police and the CPS to take action.


NELFT is only the second NHS trust in England to have been charged with corporate manslaughter, with the only previous prosecution collapsing after two weeks.

It is particularly hard to bring corporate manslaughter charges against a large, complex organisation, says Dr Victoria Roper – an associate professor at Northumbria University, who studies this area of the law. This is due to their complex organisational structures, says Dr Roper.

Corporate manslaughter charges are “reserved for the very worst management failings leading to death,” she says.

The larger the organisation, the more difficult it is to show that senior management have had “any hands-on involvement in events”. However, she says public bodies, the police and the CPS will be keeping a close eye on this case to see what can be learned from it.


Mental health campaigners believe Alice’s case highlights the poor care too many mental health patients receive. Lucy Schonegevel, director of policy and practice at the mental health charity Rethink, says it is a “devastating reminder that we don’t yet have a mental health system fit for the 21st century” and “people expect to be looked after and kept safe” on an inpatient unit. But she says the charity is aware of many cases of patients being failed.

Alice’s family believes any failing in cases such as hers must be transparent if they are to lead to improvements in mental health care, and they say they will keep pressing for that.

“It’s never been about vengeance,” Mr Figueiredo says. “It’s always been about justice and truth and accountability. That’s what has driven us.”

The trust was found guilty of failing to provide mental health in-patient services in such a way as to ensure that persons not in its employment, namely the patients, were not exposed to risks to their health or safety in connection with the use for acts of self-harm of bin liners or similar plastic bags on an acute psychiatric ward.

Akinawa was found guilty of failure to take reasonable care for the health and safety of other persons affected by his acts or omissions at work, namely the patients, by taking no sufficient steps to remove bin bags from the ward that were accessible to and capable of use for acts of self-harm, and failing to ensure that incitements of self-harm were recorded, considered and addressed.

— Accurate at time of publication | June 2025

Sign-up to the Barbour Monthly Newsletter

Get the latest Health, Safety and Environmental news and information – sign up for updates from Barbour EHS. Computer monitor What you’ll get:
  • Free downloads including Directors’ Briefings, legislation updates, webinars, risk assessments and more
  • VIP invites to events
  • Important industry news and updates
  • Invitations to hot topic webinars hosted by Barbour
  • Industry partner information

Canada | Workplace injury results in $350,000 fine

Ontario Newsroom | A worker was critically injured as a result of a Linamar Corporation’s failure to ensure that the measures and procedures prescribed by section 45(a) of Ontario Regulation 851/90 were carried out at a workplace, contrary to section 25(1)(c) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act.

On the day of the incident, an acting supervisor directed a worker to perform a broach stick tool change at the company’s Independence Place facility. A broach stick is a tool used in precision machining to remove material from a workpiece. It typically consists of a long, toothed bar that progressively cuts into the material as it passes through or along it.

The worker used a jib crane equipped with clamping attachments to insert and remove broach sticks from a broaching machine. During this operation, a 460-pound broach stick fell from the crane and struck the worker, resulting in a critical injury.

A subsequent investigation by the Ministry of Labour, Immigration, Training and Skills Development identified several contributing factors.

One key issue was that the crane controls were not functioning as designed by the manufacturer. This allowed the crane to lift a broach stick that was only partially engaged – meaning the crane’s clamp attachment was not fully closed – thereby compromising the secure handling of the heavy broach stick.

As a result, the defendant failed to ensure that the broach stick was lifted, carried or moved in a manner that did not endanger the safety of the worker, contrary to their obligations under the Occupational Health and Safety Act.

Following a guilty plea in Provincial Offences Court, Guelph, Linamar Corporation, carrying on business as Linamar Gear, was fined $350,000 with a 25% victim fine surcharge.

— Accurate at time of publication | June 2025

Sign-up to the Barbour Monthly Newsletter

Get the latest Health, Safety and Environmental news and information – sign up for updates from Barbour EHS. Computer monitor What you’ll get:
  • Free downloads including Directors’ Briefings, legislation updates, webinars, risk assessments and more
  • VIP invites to events
  • Important industry news and updates
  • Invitations to hot topic webinars hosted by Barbour
  • Industry partner information

England | Hackney food business fined nearly £20,000 for being caught fly-tipping waste nine times

Hackney Council | The owner of a popular Hackney restaurant has been fined nearly £20,000 after being caught fly-tipping their waste on nine separate occasions.

According to Hackney Council, Facing Heaven, a vegan Chinese eatery off Mare Street, ignored a warning issued after the first offence was committed in January 2023.

Fly-tipping is the illegal dumping of waste and a criminal offence under the Environmental Protection Act 1990.

By disposing of their waste in this way the business not only saved thousands of pounds in disposal costs, but it also passed those costs directly onto the council, in turn costing taxpayers.

The case was heard at Thames Magistrates’ Court and the business owner was prosecuted for fly-tipping on nine separate occasions whilst failing to have proper waste disposal measures in place.

As a result of the decision, the operator was ordered to pay £19,400, including £16,500 in fines, plus the full legal costs of £900 and the maximum victim surcharge of £2,000.

The judge concluded that the business owner knowingly committed the offences, given they had been issued with a duty of waste disposal notice by Hackney Council back in 2023 and continued to fly-tip up until October 2024.

— Accurate at time of publication | May 2025

Hackney Council | The owner of a popular Hackney restaurant has been fined nearly £20,000 after being caught fly-tipping their waste on nine separate occasions.

According to Hackney Council, Facing Heaven, a vegan Chinese eatery off Mare Street, ignored a warning issued after the first offence was committed in January 2023.

Fly-tipping is the illegal dumping of waste and a criminal offence under the Environmental Protection Act 1990.

By disposing of their waste in this way the business not only saved thousands of pounds in disposal costs, but it also passed those costs directly onto the council, in turn costing taxpayers.

The case was heard at Thames Magistrates’ Court and the business owner was prosecuted for fly-tipping on nine separate occasions whilst failing to have proper waste disposal measures in place.

As a result of the decision, the operator was ordered to pay £19,400, including £16,500 in fines, plus the full legal costs of £900 and the maximum victim surcharge of £2,000.

The judge concluded that the business owner knowingly committed the offences, given they had been issued with a duty of waste disposal notice by Hackney Council back in 2023 and continued to fly-tip up until October 2024.

— Accurate at time of publication | May 2025

England | Over 3,300 participants respond to SIA Get Licensed consultation

SIA | The Security Industry Authority (SIA) public consultation on proposed changes to licensing criteria has received over 3,300 responses.

The consultation was centred around a number of proposed changes to further strengthen the criteria that determines what makes someone eligible to hold an SIA licence.

This included changes to the criteria on criminality and providing greater transparency on the wider “fit and proper” test that all applicants and licence holders must meet. When implemented, the changes would also update the list of relevant offences the SIA takes into consideration in licensing decisions.

Based on the feedback received from the consultation, SIA says it will finalise its recommendations and seek ministerial approval in the autumn of 2025.

If the proposed changes are agreed by ministers, SIA will update “Get Licensed” and the new rules will come into effect.

— Accurate at time of publication | June 2025

Sign-up to the Barbour Monthly Newsletter

Get the latest Health, Safety and Environmental news and information – sign up for updates from Barbour EHS. Computer monitor What you’ll get:
  • Free downloads including Directors’ Briefings, legislation updates, webinars, risk assessments and more
  • VIP invites to events
  • Important industry news and updates
  • Invitations to hot topic webinars hosted by Barbour
  • Industry partner information

England | Flour mill fined after worker severs finger

HSE| A Northamptonshire-based flour company has been fined £300,000 after a maintenance worker severed one of his fingers in machinery.

 

The incident happened at ADM Milling Limited at its site on Earlstrees Industrial Estate in Corby on 28 June 2023.

David Wood, who was 59 at the time, had been carrying out maintenance work on a packer closing station. However, the 800-kilogram machine became unbalanced and tipped backwards, trapping his left hand. This resulted in the little finger on the hand being severed.

Investigating, the HSE found the company had failed to safely manage the risks of people performing maintenance at its factory.

ADM Milling Limited were required to fully assess the task that the injured person was assigned, to ensure that his health and safety was not put at risk.

ADM Milling Limited, of Brunel Road, Earlstrees Industrial Estate, Corby, Northamptonshire, pleaded guilty to breaching Section 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974. The company was fined £300,000 and ordered to pay £7,517 in costs.

HSE inspector Abbey Hodson said: “This incident was wholly avoidable. The case should highlight to industry that all maintenance tasks, whether they are planned or unplanned, should be carefully assessed and reviewed to ensure that anyone under their control is protected from harm.

“Had this task been competently risk assessed, other control measures that prevented this incident would have been identified.”

The HSE prosecution was brought by HSE enforcement lawyer Samantha Wells and paralegal officer Helen Hugo.

— Accurate at time of publication | June 2025

Sign-up to the Barbour Monthly Newsletter

Get the latest Health, Safety and Environmental news and information – sign up for updates from Barbour EHS. Computer monitor What you’ll get:
  • Free downloads including Directors’ Briefings, legislation updates, webinars, risk assessments and more
  • VIP invites to events
  • Important industry news and updates
  • Invitations to hot topic webinars hosted by Barbour
  • Industry partner information

United States | Charity cited after worker falls and suffers fatal injuries

U.S. Department of Labor | The U.S. Department of Labor has cited The Salvation Army after a 54-year-old maintenance worker suffered fatal injuries following a fall while working at an Orlando donation center and store in November 2024.

An investigation by the department’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) found the worker was repairing a roof leak when the fall occurred.

OSHA cited The Salvation Army for a repeat violation of exposing workers to fall hazards.

A similar citation was previously issued at the employer’s Princeton, West Virginia, location in January 2020.

OSHA also cited the company for five serious violations, including failure to assess workplace hazards, provide fall protection training, and ensure proper machine guarding.

Two other-than-serious violations were issued for failing to report the fatality to OSHA within eight hours of the incident and lacking a hazard communication programme.

The Salvation Army will pay $120,817 in penalties to address the violations.

— Accurate at time of publication | May 2025

Sign-up to the Barbour Monthly Newsletter

Get the latest Health, Safety and Environmental news and information – sign up for updates from Barbour EHS. Computer monitor What you’ll get:
  • Free downloads including Directors’ Briefings, legislation updates, webinars, risk assessments and more
  • VIP invites to events
  • Important industry news and updates
  • Invitations to hot topic webinars hosted by Barbour
  • Industry partner information

Canada | Workplace fatality results in a $200,000 fine for Stoney Creek-based company

Ministry of Labour, Immigration, Training and Skills Development | Following a guilty plea in Provincial Offences Court, Hamilton, Janco Steel Ltd. has been fined $200,000 and ordered to pay a 25% victim fine surcharge as required by the Provincial Offences Act.

It follows an April 2022 incident which saw a worker being fatally struck by a large industrial forklift.

On the day of the incident, a worker employed by Janco Steel Ltd. was fatally struck by an industrial forklift being operated inside the plant.

The worker was operating an overhead crane, offloading a large steel coil from a transport truck to a weight scale.

While performing the task and looking up at the load, the worker walked backwards into an interior driveway where a large industrial forklift was travelling.

The operator of the forklift did not see the worker and could not see the area immediately in front of the coil being moved by the worker.

The forklift operator was driving two-to-three kilometers per hour and immediately stopped the forklift when another worker yelled, but the forklift had already fatally struck the operator of the overhead crane.

An investigation by the Ministry of Labour, Immigration, Training and Skills Development found that the company failed, as an employer, to ensure that the operation of the Taylor Forklift, model X650L, was directed by a signaller when its operator did not have a full view of the intended path of travel.

— Accurate at time of publication | May 2025

Sign-up to the Barbour Monthly Newsletter

Get the latest Health, Safety and Environmental news and information – sign up for updates from Barbour EHS. Computer monitor What you’ll get:
  • Free downloads including Directors’ Briefings, legislation updates, webinars, risk assessments and more
  • VIP invites to events
  • Important industry news and updates
  • Invitations to hot topic webinars hosted by Barbour
  • Industry partner information

England | London man convicted of possession of two forged SIA licences

Security Industry Authority | A man found in possession of two forged SIA licences has pleaded guilty to fraud and been ordered to pay £2,600 in fines and costs.

Charles Ibikunle pleaded guilty at Highbury Corner Magistrates’ Court to two counts of fraud under the Fraud Act 2006 in relation to a pair of forged SIA licences found in his possession.

The Metropolitan Police stopped Mr. Ibikunle while he was driving a vehicle, at which point they found the two licences which were later confirmed to be forged. The Metropolitan Police then referred this case to the SIA.

The SIA invited Mr. Ibikunle to attend an interview about the forged licences, which he declined to attend. This resulted in a court summons.

In response to his guilty plea, the court ordered Mr. Ibikunle to pay a fine of £1,000 for each offence, as well as a victim surcharge of £400 and prosecution costs of £200, totalling £2,600.

— Accurate at time of publication | May 2025

Sign-up to the Barbour Monthly Newsletter

Get the latest Health, Safety and Environmental news and information – sign up for updates from Barbour EHS. Computer monitor What you’ll get:
  • Free downloads including Directors’ Briefings, legislation updates, webinars, risk assessments and more
  • VIP invites to events
  • Important industry news and updates
  • Invitations to hot topic webinars hosted by Barbour
  • Industry partner information

England | Fines after worker falls from height

HSE | Two Shrewsbury-based companies have been fined after a worker fell through a roof during extension work on a house extension.

The injured man was one of several workers employed by Roofrite (Shropshire) Limited carrying out work on the roof of the property on 9 December 2022. The firm had been appointed by principal contractor Harding and Houlston Building Contractors Limited to install the roof on the property.

While working on the roof, the man accidently stepped in an area where there was an opening for a window that was yet to be installed, resulting in him falling through and to the ground below. He suffered fractures to his spine and ribs.

The HSE’s investigation found that external scaffold had been put into place around the perimeter of the extension to allow workers access to the roof. However, there were no measures in place internally to prevent falls into the extension and to the ground below.

The HSE investigation also found that Roofrite (Shropshire) Limited had failed to properly plan the work and to provide its workers with suitable instructions for carrying out their duties safely. Harding and Houlston Building Contractors Limited had also failed to ensure that the roof work had been properly planned, and failed to carry out any monitoring of the work that was being completed by the roofers on the site, which was under its control.

Roofrite (Shropshire) Limited of Atcham Business Park, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, pleaded guilty to breaching three charges of Regulation 6(3) of the Work at Height Regulations 2005 and were fined £8,000 and order to pay costs of £2,990 at a hearing at Kidderminster Magistrates’ Court on 19 May 2025.

Harding and Houlston Building Contractors Limited of Emstrey House North, Shrewsbury Business Park, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, pleaded guilty to breaching Regulation 13(1) of the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 and were fined £500 and order to pay costs of £2,990 at the same hearing.

HSE inspector Sara Andrews said “Working at height remains one of the leading causes of workplace injury and death.

“This incident highlights the importance of undertaking a thorough assessment of the risks for all work at height activities. Suitable control measures, such as internal crash deck, should also be implemented to minimise the risk of serious personal injury.

“All principal contractors must ensure such control measures are in place throughout the duration of the work.”

This prosecution was brought by HSE enforcement lawyer Nathan Cook and paralegal officer Gabrielle O’Sullivan.

— Accurate at time of publication | May 2025

Sign-up to the Barbour Monthly Newsletter

Get the latest Health, Safety and Environmental news and information – sign up for updates from Barbour EHS. Computer monitor What you’ll get:
  • Free downloads including Directors’ Briefings, legislation updates, webinars, risk assessments and more
  • VIP invites to events
  • Important industry news and updates
  • Invitations to hot topic webinars hosted by Barbour
  • Industry partner information
✉ Sign up to the Barbour Newsletter

Free downloads, advance notice of webinars, product updates and perks – all straight to your inbox.

  • Barbour EHS may from time to time send updates about Barbour products and services. By providing your contact information you consent to being contacted for direct marketing purposes by Barbour EHS. Please ensure you review our Privacy Policy.