England | Company fined after blaming sacked employee for pollution

January 20, 2025

Environment Agency | A Weston-super-Mare company boss blamed a sacked employee for pollution that killed more than 300 fish in the River Banwell.

However, the company, Brooke Additives Ltd of the Rolston Farm Business Park, Weston-super-Mare has now been fined £3,600 after admitting a charge relating to the pollution incident in April 2023. The company was also ordered to pay costs and a victim surcharge totalling £5,119.18 for its breach of the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2016.

In a case brought by the Environment Agency, Exeter magistrates heard that officers went to Silver Moor Lane after a member of staff reported seeing dead fish on the River Banwell. Tests showed high levels of ammonia and the dark colour of water in a rhyne, entering the river and staining of riverbed vegetation, showed the pollution had been entering the water for some time.

More dead fish were seen downstream and, after following the rhyne, the officers found a pipe discharging a clear liquid directly into the watercourse. A test at this point showed very high levels of ammonia and calcification in the pipe, indicating the liquid had been discharging over a considerable period.

The pipe was traced to Brooke Additives Ltd, which produces AdBlue, a urea-based fuel additive. Agency officers spoke to company staff and to limit further pollution a soil bund was created. Brooke Additives director Glyn Brooke blamed a sacked former employee for the pollution.

The Environment Agency’s investigation found 345 dead fish with environmental damage stretching over a two-kilometre length of watercourse.

During a later interview, Mr. Brooke and fellow director Mark Heuff said the company accepted responsibility for the pollution but maintained it had been caused by a sacked former employee. They said staff had seen this person pouring liquid down a drain, which was not company procedure. However, the Environment Agency showed that the pollution continued for two months after the alleged sacking.

Following the incident the company also took further remedial action, including diverting site drains to a newly built sump, installing CCTV, and providing staff training.


— Accurate at time of publication | January 2025

Sign-up to the Barbour Monthly Newsletter

Get the latest Health, Safety and Environmental news and information – sign up for updates from Barbour EHS. Computer monitor What you’ll get:
  • Free downloads including Directors’ Briefings, legislation updates, webinars, risk assessments and more
  • VIP invites to events
  • Important industry news and updates
  • Invitations to hot topic webinars hosted by Barbour
  • Industry partner information
[ssba-buttons]

You May Also Be Interested In

Comments are closed.

✉ Sign up to the Barbour Newsletter

Free downloads, advance notice of webinars, product updates and perks – all straight to your inbox.

  • Barbour EHS may from time to time send updates about Barbour products and services. By providing your contact information you consent to being contacted for direct marketing purposes by Barbour EHS. Please ensure you review our Privacy Policy.