News

Australia | Record $1.75 million fine for construction company over worker death

Antonia Maddocks

2 min read

structural steel columns standing together with sky and clouds appearing through the back

Government of Western Australia | A construction company has been fined a record $1.75 million over the death of a worker who was struck by a falling structural steel column, the highest fine ever imposed under WA’s workplace safety laws.

AR Constructions (currently in the process of liquidation) pleaded guilty to failing to ensure the health and safety of a worker and, by that failure, causing his death and was fined in the Midland Magistrates Court.

AR Constructions had been engaged by principal contractor Glask Construction to erect structural steel, including standing columns, at a large industrial construction site in Malaga in July 2024.

In order to erect the steel columns, they were moved by crane using a series of lifting devices to a designated rag bolt assembly, then further secured by a dogger and a rigger.

On the day of the incident, three AR Constructions workers, a crane operator, a dogger, and a rigger, were engaged in erecting standing columns at the Malaga site.

The dogger applied a lifting device to the crane’s lifting chains, and the column was lifted and suspended 30cm from the ground in anticipation of being placed on the rag bolt assembly by the dogger and rigger.

While the dogger was elsewhere on the site the rigger entered the danger zone of the suspended column. The lifting device failed and the column fell onto the rigger, resulting in fatal injuries.

The lifting device used on the lift (a “Pink Lug”) was non-proprietary and was not compliant with the Lifting Standard, not being rated or marked with its working load limit. It resembled other suitable, proprietary lifting devices on site in colour, size, and attachment mechanism.

In addition, there were no records on how long it was used for, where it was sourced from, who manufactured it, if it was ever inspected or tested or its rated capacity.

The court heard that the company’s directors were aware that the Pink Lug was not rated or compliant but did not remove it from use.

– Accurate at time of publication | June 2026

Sign-up to the Barbour Monthly Newsletter

Get the latest Health, Safety and Environmental news and information – sign up for updates from Barbour EHS. 

What you’ll get:

  • Free downloads including Directors’ Briefings, legislation updates, webinars, risk assessments and more
  • VIP invites to events
  • Important industry news and updates
  • Invitations to hot topic webinars hosted by Barbour
  • Industry partner information

You may also be interested in